Sphinx  Commentary

July 12, 2001
 
U2 Ain't Gonna Play Mexico City
Innocent Spanish Eyes Get the Royal Treatment
 
According to a report by TeenHollywood, U2 is refusing to play concerts in Mexico on its current tour because of an incident which occurred approximately four years ago involving the sons of a former Mexican president. Get this: as a result of the irresponsible behavior of two sons of previous Mexican president, Ernesto Zedillo, U2 has decided to penalize a whole country of fans who had absolutely ZERO involvement in this incident.
 
The story states U2 Security Director Jerry Milly recieved injuries as a result of a confrontation with the bodyguards of the former president's sons. During a U2 concert in 1997, the two sons attempted to enter a restricted backstage area when they were stopped by U2 security, causing the scuffle.
 
Since July of 2000, Mexico has been under the leadership of a new president, Vincente Fox, elected by Mexican U2 fans who apparently no longer cared for former President Zedillo.
 
What is U2 actually saying to the Mexican people by refusing to play in their country? U2 is ramming it to a whole developing nation of 100,000,000 people because their previous president refused to apologize for the 1997 incident? Does this make sense or is this just another U2 smokescreen designed to hide and distort the truth?
 
If Zedillo was still president, U2's decision to skip Mexico would be understandable. After all, it was his sons who allegedly caused the disturbance. Earth to U2: Zedillo left office one year ago, thanks to the Mexican people.
 
By not re-electing Zedillo, the Mexican people gave a clear message they no longer care for his leadership. By holding a grudge and taking it out on the Mexican population, U2 is way out of line. This leads one to believe the decision by U2 to skip Mexico may be influenced by a little more than meets the eye. According to this story, concert grosses are down significantly from last year and acts may need to cut back on their touring, especially to poorer, lesser developed countries.
 
U2 concerts tickets currently range from $US 45.00 to $125.00, which is quite a few pesos for residents of a developing country like Mexico. Although no one questions whether or not the backstage incident occurred in 1997, was U2's decision to shaft Mexican fans made easier by the fact that Mexico is a much poorer country than their neighbors to the north? Was this just a convenient excuse by U2 to avoid a poor country where concert revenues cannot approach USA concert revenues?
 
After completing their first North American leg, U2 appears to be in quite a rush to return to North America (last time we checked, Mexico was also part of North America), where fans are wealthy enough and willing enough to shell out outrageous sums of money for concert tickets. U2's reasoning for returning to the USA a second time is that they did not meet the demand for tickets the first time around. How about the demand in the rest of the world?
 
Why doesn't U2 tour South America and Australia next since they have already graced North American fans with their clouded presence? Answer: it's no secret South American countries are just as poor as Mexico and the Australian dollar is quite weak.
 
The Zedillo sons' incident appears to be a smokescreen, possibly hiding the real reason why U2 is taking a pass on Mexico. U2 claims they are sticking up for their security team by sticking it to 100,000,000 innocent Mexicans. If U2 cannot stick up for the fans who put food on their tables (click here for a fan story from Boston), why should we believe they would stick up for one of their blue collar employees, also known as the little guy?
 
Want more to chew on? U2 lead leprechaun Bono has been tirelessly championing the Drop the Debt campaign for a couple of years now. The campaign is fighting to eliminate debts owed by poorer African countries to richer western countries like the USA.
 
On the one hand, Bono stands up for these less fortunate countries with Drop the Debt, on the other hand his band refuses to play in poorer countries, apparently because the concert revenues are not as lucrative as those in richer countries. Is something disgustingly wrong with this picture?
 
The decision to dump on innocent Mexican fans once again signifies U2's lack of compassion toward their following. So as U2 thanks everyone for being a fan (at these absurd prices, can you blame them?), the Mexican fans say gracias to U2 for helping them save their time and money on a group of individuals with questionable motives.
 
Now if we can just get U2 and their warped ideology to stay away from the rest of North America. How about we tell the band the truth? We are all broke from spending our "hard earned money" on an overpriced and overrated rock show.
 
Maybe as a response to U2's slight, Mexicans should pass on the next U2 album, which would hit them right where it hurts - in their pockets.
 
Sphinx Niteclub
Alternative Since 1978